Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(2) This lifecycle is explained visually in Figure 1: Typical lifecycle of Victoria University internally-accredited courses. (3) HESF: 3.1 Course Design, 5.1 Course Approval and Accreditation, 5.3 Monitoring, Review and Improvement. (6) See Courses Lifecycle Policy. (7) The accreditation by VU of a new higher degree by research course must comply with: (8) Figure 1: Typical lifecycle of Victoria University internally-accredited courses (9) Figure 2: Key development, consultation, endorsement and approval steps and responsibilities involved in the internal accreditation of higher degree by research courses at Victoria University (10) VU Graduate Research Training and Supervision Quality and Standards FrameworkCourses Lifecycle - Course Approval Procedure - Higher Degrees by Research
Section 1 - Summary
Section 2 - HESF/ASQA/ESOS Alignment
Section 3 - Scope
Top of PageSection 4 - Definitions
Top of PageSection 5 - Policy/Regulation
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Roles and Responsibilities
Roles
Responsibilities
Vice-Chancellor
Approves the accreditation of higher degree by research courses at VU.
Director, Academic Quality and Standards
Provides advice to the Vice-Chancellor and the Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research & Impact at key steps in the approval path for new University-wide higher degree by research courses.
Deputy Vice-Chancellor, Research & Impact
Approves strategic rationales, full academic proposals for new University-wide higher degree by research courses and annual curriculum plans.
Endorses and provides recommendations to the Academic Board's Research and Research Training Committee on full academic proposals for new University-wide higher degree by research courses and approves the business case for new higher research degree courses.
Deans Academic
Endorses College-related components of strategic rationales and full academic proposals for new University-wide higher degree by research courses.
Dean, Graduate Research
Oversees the development of strategic rationales and full academic proposals for new University-wide higher degree by research courses.
Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Chief Academic Officer
Provides advice on TNE proposal and endorses full academic proposals for new University-wide higher degree by research courses.
Associate Director Research Training, Research Institute, nominated by the Executive Director Research Institute
Endorses components related to Research Institute.
VU Research Steering Committee
Provides advice to the Dean at key steps in the development and approval path for internally accredited courses.
VU Research Executive Group
Endorses proposals to go to Research and Research Training Committee/ Academic Board for endorsement.
Academic Board
Evaluates the curriculum and other pedagogical aspects of the proposed course, and after being satisfied of the academic rigour and quality of the program warrants its inclusion as part of the University course profile.
Graduate Research School
Provides support and advice for the course design and development and course governance processes, together with other areas of shared services as appropriate.
Library and other Shared Services as appropriate
Provides support and advice for course design and development.
Part B - General
Top of PageSection 7 - Supporting Documents and Information