Document Feedback - Review and Comment
Step 1 of 4: Comment on Document
How to make a comment?
1. Use this to open a comment box for your chosen Section, Part, Heading or clause.
2. Type your feedback into the comments box and then click "save comment" button located in the lower-right of the comment box.
3. Do not open more than one comment box at the same time.
4. When you have finished making comments proceed to the next stage by clicking on the "Continue to Step 2" button at the very bottom of this page.
Important Information
During the comment process you are connected to a database. Like internet banking, the session that connects you to the database may time-out due to inactivity. If you do not have JavaScript running you will recieve a message to advise you of the length of time before the time-out. If you have JavaScript enabled, the time-out is lengthy and should not cause difficulty, however you should note the following tips to avoid losing your comments or corrupting your entries:
-
DO NOT jump between web pages/applications while logging comments.
-
DO NOT log comments for more than one document at a time. Complete and submit all comments for one document before commenting on another.
-
DO NOT leave your submission half way through. If you need to take a break, submit your current set of comments. The system will email you a copy of your comments so you can identify where you were up to and add to them later.
-
DO NOT exit from the interface until you have completed all three stages of the submission process.
(1) This Procedure outlines the process for formal Unsatisfactory Progress. (2) HESF: Standard 1.3 Orientation and Progression; 4.2 Research Training; 7.2 Information for Prospective and Current Students. (3) ESOS Act: Part 3 Division 2; Part 5 Division 2. National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 – Standard 8 and Standard 9. (4) This Procedure applies to domestic and international candidates and University employees. (5) Lapsed status - Failure to re-enrol by a census date. (6) Timely duration - The normal period of time, deemed by the Commonwealth, for the degree level to be completed (subject to degree type). (7) Elapsed candidature time - The total amount of time a candidate has been enrolled in their research degree. This is expressed in full-time enrolment (EFT). (8) Higher Degrees by Research Policy (9) International candidates are required by VUG, in accordance with the National Code of Practice for Providers of Education and Training to Overseas Students 2018 (Cth) to submit a Bi-annual Progress Report and will be advised each year at what time of year these reports are required. (10) The Bi-annual Progress Report will specify a final submission date for Bi-annual Progress Report based upon the sponsor’s requirement. If a candidate requires an extension to the due date to submit the Bi-annual Progress Report they must apply for an official extension to VUG at least one week prior to the due date. (11) The candidate will be advised in writing by VUG of the decision regarding the official extension and the new submission date of the Bi-annual Progress Report(s) required by their sponsor, if applicable. (12) Evidence of submission of the Bi-annual Progress Report by the candidate to the Principal Supervisor will be considered to constitute submission of the report in cases where difficulty is being experienced in gaining Principal Supervisor sign off. (13) Unsatisfactory Progress is when a candidate is not making satisfactory progress in their research degree. Grounds for Unsatisfactory Progress to be initiated by the Research Institutes are: (14) Where the relevant Associate Director, Research Institute or nominee supports the commencement of Unsatisfactory Progress Proceedings, they must inform GRS and provide in writing: (15) When GRS receives notification in writing, GRS will collate evidence (e.g. copies of transcripts, candidature milestone outcomes, email/letter correspondence) and prepare the documentation for review by the Dean, Graduate Research who may seek further clarification/documentation from the candidate and/or supervisor prior to formalising Unsatisfactory Progress Proceedings. (16) If it is determined that Unsatisfactory Progress Proceedings proceed, GRS will send a written notice to a candidate who is the subject of an active Unsatisfactory Progress Proceeding. This notice will be sent by registered mail to the current address of the candidate as recorded in the University student system, as well as to the VU @live email account. (17) The written notification will include the Request for an Unsatisfactory Progress Panel Hearing form, the time and date of the Hearing, which will be scheduled no less than 15 University business days from the date of notification. (18) If the candidate wishes to attend the Hearing, they must lodge the Request for an Unsatisfactory Progress Panel Hearing form within 5 University business days from the date of notification. (19) If the candidate does not submit the Request for an Unsatisfactory Progress Panel Hearing or does not respond to the notice within five University business days from the date of notification, VU will determine the candidate is deemed to be making Unsatisfactory Progress. GRS, with the authorisation from the Dean, Graduate Research, will advise the candidate that their enrolment will be discontinued within 20 University business days from the date of authorisation. (20) The Panel for a Hearing shall be comprised of: (21) The Panel will be supported by the GRS to take minutes and provide other necessary administrative support. (22) The candidate is encouraged to submit a written statement (no more than three pages) addressed to the Chair of the Panel at least five working days prior to the Unsatisfactory Progress Hearing. The statement should describe any special needs or extenuating circumstances (including whether the candidate has registered for disability support) and include supporting documentation. (23) The candidate's Principal Supervisor must attend and participate in the Hearing unless on extended leave whereby the Acting Principal Supervisor would attend. Associate Supervisors are invited to attend, but it is not mandatory that they attend. (24) The candidate may bring a support person or advocate to the Hearing. Such a person will be an observer only and will not participate in discussions. Support is available from Student Advocacy. (25) All persons attending a Hearing will be subject to the orders and direction of the Chair of the Panel. (26) In the event that any person required to attend a Hearing is unable to attend in person, because of illness, absence abroad/interstate or other compelling reasons, they may participate via telephone or teleconference and/or nominate a representative to attend the Hearing on their behalf. Support is available from Student Advocacy. (27) Whether a candidate requested a Hearing or not, or attends or does not attend the Hearing, the Panel will make a decision regarding the candidate’s progress and ongoing candidature. The Panel will take into account previous candidature progress history, overall elapsed candidature time and information provided by the Principal or Acting Supervisor, that have led to the Unsatisfactory Progress nomination. (28) With reference to clause (27), the Panel may make one of the four following recommendations to the Candidate: (29) The candidate will be advised of the outcome of any Unsatisfactory Progress meeting or Hearing at its conclusion in writing within five University business days. International candidates must also be informed that the University will advise relevant government departments and agencies of any unsatisfactory performance. (30) A record of each individual Hearing and outcomes will be retained on the candidate's official file maintained by GRS. For international candidates, a copy must also be included on the candidate's file at VUG. (31) A report of all Hearings and outcomes in each calendar year will be prepared by GRS for the Dean, Graduate Research for presentation in the following year of the Research and Research Training Committee of the Academic Board. (32) GRS is responsible for all notifications and ensuring that any discontinuation event is recorded on all University systems. (33) A Panel’s decision in relation to Unsatisfactory Progress can only be appealed in accordance with the University's Student Appeals Regulations 2019 Clause (5).Higher Degrees by Research Procedure 4 Progress
Section 1 - Summary
Section 2 - TEQSA/ASQA/ESOS Alignment
Section 3 - Scope
Section 4 - Definitions
Section 5 - Policy/Regulation
Section 6 - Procedures
Part A - Summary of Roles and Responsibilities
Part B - Bi-annual Progress Reports – International Candidates Only
Submission and Timing of Bi-annual Progress Reports
Part C - Unsatisfactory Progress
Grounds for Unsatisfactory Progress
Unsatisfactory Progress Proceedings
Unsatisfactory Progress Hearings
Notification and Records