View Document

Staff Performance and Development Planning (SPDP) Policy and Procedures

This is not a current document. It has been repealed and is no longer in force.

Section 1 - Purpose / Objectives

(1) The Staff Performance and Development Plan (SPDP) process provides a structured opportunity for staff to plan for and reflect on individual goals and professional development and is integral to the growth of staff and their accountability with the University. The process links closely to career planning and development, promotion, probation, succession planning and mechanisms for identifying and addressing poor performance.

(2) This process reflects the University's commitment to providing staff with forward-looking opportunities for personal and professional growth. Through this, organisational capacity and capabilities will be strengthened which will in turn support the achievement of the University outcomes in engaged teaching, learning and research.

Top of Page

Section 2 - Scope / Application

(3) All ongoing and fixed term staff members will have an individual staff performance and development plan annually agreed no later than March each year.

Top of Page

Section 3 - Definitions

(4) Staff Performance and Development Plan — a structured, individualised approach to managing performance and developing capability in the University. The process is designed to allow supervisors and staff to create simple, effective performance and development plans and to easily review performance against those plans where performance refers to both the application of skills and conduct /behaviour.

(5) Professional development — A systematic approach to professional and career development to ensure that all staff have the capabilities necessary to fulfil their roles, develop themselves and their careers, adapt to change and assist in developing others.

(6) Review —

  1. A meeting held between the supervisor and staff member specifically to discuss performance and progress measured against their performance and development plan.
  2. A document which sets out an individual's progress and performance towards their plan by way of ratings and comments by both the staff member and the supervisor.

(7) Plan - an abbreviation for the Staff Performance and Development Plan, usually referred to when discussing an individual's plan as part of the annual performance and development cycle.

Top of Page

Section 4 - Policy Statement

Principles

(8) The SPDP process focuses on growth and aims to provide every staff member with personal and professional development opportunities.

(9) The SPDP process is based on feedback where every staff member has regular meaningful performance conversations with their supervisor and engages in a process of giving, seeking and receiving constructive feedback.

(10) The SPDP process is intended to be a dynamic, interactive and transparent one based on the principles of :

  1. shared responsibility, with each supervisor and staff member expected to make a contribution to the staff member's annual Plan, and,
  2. accountability, where there is transparent documentation of staff member's goals, workload and achievements.

(11) The SPDP process is approached in a manner that is fair and transparent, consistent with the values of the University and that encourages trust and regular, open communication.

(12) The process aligns the individual's annual objectives and performance with the University's Strategic Plan and values, setting clear goals, targets, expectations and standards for both performance and behaviour. Performance and conduct/behaviour is then assessed in relation to these goals and targets and consistent with both the individuals' position description and with the workload allocation as agreed each year.

(13) The University encourages and supports a culture of continuous learning and performance improvement through ongoing professional and career development of its staff.

(14) The SPDP process will encourage staff to perform at their best.

(15) The SPDP process will assist staff who are not performing at the required level through the identification of guidance, support and professional development opportunities required for their performance to improve.

Policy

(16) Participation in the SPDP process is mandatory for all ongoing and fixed term staff, irrespective of time fraction and/or length of contract.

(17) The process is based on an annual planning and review cycle coordinated with VU's planning to effectively align individual goals with University objectives. The SPDP cycle involves at least two formal performance meetings between a staff member and supervisor during each cycle. However, it is expected that a staff member and his/her supervisor will informally discuss performance more regularly as a means of supporting continuous improvement practices.

STAFF PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANNUAL CYCLE
Time line Action Reference
December — March
- Review prior year's objectives and consider outcomes.
- Set objectives for coming year.
- Agree professional development.
"SPDP Round"
By end March - SPDP plan agreed for coming year.  
July/August
- Review of objectives and progress to date through the Mid Cycle Review process.
- Opportunity for updating objectives or re-setting priorities for second six months of the Plan.
"Mid Cycle Review"

(18) In establishing the annual Plan, supervisors and staff will set clear performance objectives reflecting workplace priorities, team and organisational plans and individual career plans. In this way the process closely links the priorities of the University Strategic direction and priorities and associated unit strategic plans to the individual's Plan. See Flowchart .

(19) The Plan encompasses continuous learning, improvement and individual career progression.

(20) The Plan focuses on performance standards using evidence/data (eg a portfolio approach) through such mechanisms as peer and student evaluations or other documented evaluation tools, and values staff, student and client feedback.

(21) The Plan supports the development of strategies to:

  1. further encourage high performance, and
  2. identify support and development to improve performance by linking to the University's industrial obligations, policies and processes for managing performance that does not meet expected standards.

(22) The Plan is integral to the University's procedures for salary increments and its policy framework on rewards and recognition; the performance review ratings will have a direct correlation with these policies and procedures.

(23) Opportunities for professional and career development, including Higher Education academic promotions processes, can be identified through the Plan. The action undertaken by both the staff member and the supervisor in relation to these opportunities, as well as the outcomes, are documented as part of the SPDP review process.

(24) The SPDP process is undertaken by a staff member's usual line manager ("supervisor") unless alternative arrangements are more appropriate for the purposes of the SPDP.

(25) If a staff member is aggrieved by the process and all efforts to remedy the situation at the local level are exhausted, the staff member may request that the Senior Officer of the organisational unit reviews the situation. The Senior Officer will then determine the matter. If the staff member's supervisor is the Senior or Principal Officer, then the relevant Principal Officer or the Vice Chancellor respectively will review the situation and determine the matter.

Top of Page

Section 5 - Procedures

Accountabilities

Responsibilities

(26) The Staff Member is responsible for:

  1. contributing to the development of their SPDP;
  2. maintaining an up to date portfolio of evidence to support their performance;
  3. actively using opportunities for personal and professional development;
  4. attending relevant SPDP training when required.

(27) The Supervisor is responsible for:

  1. providing ongoing, regular and constructive feedback to staff;
  2. approving plans;
  3. ensuring that plans are aligned to unit goals;
  4. formally meeting with the staff member to review — annually and mid cycle;
  5. completing relevant training.

(28) Where a staff member has more than one supervisor, the nominated primary supervisor is responsible for consulting with the other supervisor(s) to determine the plan and review comments.

(29) People and Culture is responsible for:

  1. the implementation, maintenance and review of this Policy;
  2. maintaining and enhancing the online tool;
  3. providing effective training.

SPDP Learning and Development

(30) SPDP guidance and support will be provided by the People and Organisational Development Unit (POD) throughout the year and in particular during the SPDP rounds.

(31) Additional support and assistance with the SPDP process will be provided by People and Culture Consultants, the SPDP Helpdesk, and a network of identified SPDP Champions.

Procedures

(32) The SPDP comprises several key steps, listed below in Appendix 1 .

  1. The University's strategic priorities set the objectives and high level key performance indicators (KPIs) which cascade into each area's strategic and operational plan.
  2. The strategic plans for organisational units then identify objectives, KPIs and strategies for new initiatives and continuous improvement for these areas. These are normally made reference to in each staff member's Plan.
  3. For academic staff members, the VU Standards for Academic Levels as set out in the Academic Classification Policy are also articulated at this stage of the Plan.
  4. Supervisors should complete their own Plan before they develop a Plan with their staff members to ensure overall alignment.
  5. The staff member and their supervisor then develop a Plan based on clauses (26)b, (26)c, and (26)d above, the staff member's position description and consistent with the workload allocation agreed for that year. For example, an academic or teaching staff member may plan around their teaching and learning, research activity, external engagement, etc.
  6. Plans will set out for each staff member:
    1. Their performance objectives for the current year.
    2. Any VU wide mandatory training required for the current year.
    3. Objectives related to the VU Values and Behaviours.
    4. Their agreed professional development activities for the coming year which will support them in achieving their objectives.
    5. Their career aspirations and opportunities (optional).
    6. The support required from their supervisor to help them achieve their objectives.
  7. The Plan is then used as the basis for the formal review meetings between the staff member and their supervisor. At least two formal review meetings should take place during each annual cycle: one in July/August to review progress and update the plan (the 'Mid Cycle Review') and a review in December — March to discuss and assess outcomes.
  8. The staff member is advised to collect on an ongoing basis evidence /data relating to their Plan for use in the review meetings; a portfolio approach is encouraged. Likewise, the supervisor should fully prepare for the reviews collating information and feedback relating to the staff member's Plan on an ongoing basis.
  9. During the planning meeting, support and development opportunities, including those for career development, are identified including, where necessary, strategies to improve performance that does not meet expected standards (Appendix 2, Guidelines, Performance Improvement Planning).
  10. Once agreed, the Plan is approved online and a copy is available at any time to the staff member, their supervisor, their supervisor's supervisor and up the line in accordance with an effective management framework.

(33) The Plan recognises that an individual's responsibilities, duties and key performance indicators may vary over time according to changing organisational needs. Accordingly the process allows for reasonable and agreed modifications to be made.

(34) An outline of the objectives of, and processes associated with, the SPDP will be incorporated into the University's induction and orientation processes for all new staff.

(35) The Vice Chancellor, who has online access to the plans for all staff members, reserves the right from time to time to undertake a check on the quality of individual plans to ensure consistency and quality of approach to the SPDP process.

Appendix 1 - Summary of the SPDP Online Process

TIME ACTION WHO
December - March Staff details from HRIS uploaded to SPDP online tool SPDP Administrator
December - March Staff and supervisor draft a plan in preparation for their one on one discussion Supervisor & Staff member
December - March One-on one meeting to discuss draft Plan and agree final Plan Supervisor & Staff Member
July - August Formal mid-year review of objectives and progress to date Supervisor & Staff Member
July - September Enhancements made to SPDP online tool in response to feedback, testing undertaken and resources updated SPDP Administrator
December - March Formal end of year review. Cycle starts again and new plans developed. Supervisor & Staff Member
Top of Page

Section 6 - Guidelines

(36) See Appendix 2.